NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Forerunner 955 Solar

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Forerunner 955 Solar

What Falcon does better (8) and where Forerunner 955 Solar wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 955 Solar
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 955 Solar
4.8Score
3 advantages≈ $600
6.6Display3.8
5.3Battery life6.4
9.8Sports & outdoor6.0
9.6Build & durability2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconForerunner 955 Solar
49.4 × 47.21346.5 × 46.514.4
FalconForerunner 955 SolarDifference
Height47.2 mm46.5 mm+0.7 mm
Width49.4 mm46.5 mm+3 mm
Thickness13 mm14.4 mm−1.5 mm
Weight64 g53 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Forerunner 955 Solar?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Forerunner 955 Solar: No
  3. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 955 Solar: No
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 802×
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 260 px+60%
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 14.4 mm+11%
  8. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 20 h+5%

Why is Forerunner 955 Solar better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 15 days+7%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 42 h+11%
  3. Weight64 g vs 53 g+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare