NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Forerunner 965

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Forerunner 965

What Falcon does better (5) and where Forerunner 965 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 965
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 965
6.0Score
4 advantages≈ $600
6.6Display6.5
5.3Battery life6.8
9.8Sports & outdoor6.0
9.6Build & durability2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconForerunner 965
49.4 × 47.21347.2 × 47.213.2
FalconForerunner 965Difference
Height47.2 mm47.2 mm=
Width49.4 mm47.2 mm+2.2 mm
Thickness13 mm13.2 mm−0.2 mm
Weight64 g53 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Forerunner 965?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 31 h+23%
  3. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 965: No
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 802×
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 19 h+11%

Why is Forerunner 965 better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 23 days+64%
  2. Weight64 g vs 53 g+21%
  3. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.4″+9%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare