NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Instinct 2X Solar

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Instinct 2X Solar

What Falcon does better (8) and where Instinct 2X Solar wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 2X Solar
Garmin · 2022Instinct 2X Solar
6.6Score
4 advantages≈ $450
6.6Display4.0
5.3Battery life8.7
9.8Sports & outdoor5.5
9.6Build & durability5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconInstinct 2X Solar
49.4 × 47.21350 × 5014.5
FalconInstinct 2X SolarDifference
Height47.2 mm50 mm−2.8 mm
Width49.4 mm50 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14.5 mm−1.6 mm
Weight64 g67 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Instinct 2X Solar?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct 2X Solar: No
  3. Pixel density326 ppi vs 113 ppi2.9×
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 176 px2.4×
  5. Sport profiles160 vs 772.1×
  6. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 2X Solar: No
  7. Weight64 g vs 67 g+5%
  8. Thickness13 mm vs 14.5 mm+12%

Why is Instinct 2X Solar better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 40 days2.9×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 60 h+58%
  3. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.56″+22%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 27 h+29%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare