NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What Falcon does better (4) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
4 advantages≈ $400
6.6Display5.6
5.3Battery life7.3
9.8Sports & outdoor6.6
9.6Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED
49.4 × 47.21350 × 5014.4
FalconInstinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height47.2 mm50 mm−2.8 mm
Width49.4 mm50 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14.4 mm−1.5 mm
Weight64 g59 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED: No
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 96+67%
  4. Thickness13 mm vs 14.4 mm+11%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 24 days+71%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 40 h+5%
  3. Weight64 g vs 59 g+8%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 30 h+43%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare