NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition

What Falcon does better (7) and where Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition
6.9Score
5 advantages≈ $500
6.6Display4.0
5.3Battery life8.8
9.8Sports & outdoor6.5
9.6Build & durability5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconInstinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition
49.4 × 47.21350 × 5014.4
FalconInstinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical EditionDifference
Height47.2 mm50 mm−2.8 mm
Width49.4 mm50 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14.4 mm−1.5 mm
Weight64 g58 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition: No
  3. Pixel density326 ppi vs 113 ppi2.9×
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 176 px2.4×
  5. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition: No
  6. Sport profiles160 vs 95+68%
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 14.4 mm+11%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar Tactical Edition better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 40 days2.9×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 60 h+58%
  3. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.56″+22%
  4. Weight64 g vs 58 g+10%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 34 h+62%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare