NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Instinct Crossover AMOLED

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED

What Falcon does better (8) and where Instinct Crossover AMOLED wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct Crossover AMOLED
6.4Score
0 advantages≈ $650
6.6Display5.9
5.3Battery life4.0
9.8Sports & outdoor6.8
9.6Build & durability9.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconInstinct Crossover AMOLED
49.4 × 47.21346.6 × 46.615.1
FalconInstinct Crossover AMOLEDDifference
Height47.2 mm46.6 mm+0.6 mm
Width49.4 mm46.6 mm+2.9 mm
Thickness13 mm15.1 mm−2.2 mm
Weight64 g67 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Instinct Crossover AMOLED?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 29 h+31%
  3. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.2″+7%
  4. Weight64 g vs 67 g+5%
  5. Sport profiles160 vs 97+65%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 15 h+40%
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 15.1 mm+17%
  8. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%

Why is Instinct Crossover AMOLED better than Falcon?

Instinct Crossover AMOLED has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare