NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Instinct Crossover Solar

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Instinct Crossover Solar

What Falcon does better (8) and where Instinct Crossover Solar wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct Crossover Solar
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ $450
6.6Display2.6
5.3Battery life6.8
9.8Sports & outdoor5.3
9.6Build & durability5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconInstinct Crossover Solar
49.4 × 47.21345 × 4516.2
FalconInstinct Crossover SolarDifference
Height47.2 mm45 mm+2.2 mm
Width49.4 mm45 mm+4.5 mm
Thickness13 mm16.2 mm−3.2 mm
Weight64 g65 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Instinct Crossover Solar?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 25 h+52%
  2. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct Crossover Solar: No
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 176 px2.4×
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 139 ppi2.3×
  6. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct Crossover Solar: No
  7. Sport profiles160 vs 84+90%
  8. Thickness13 mm vs 16.2 mm+25%

Why is Instinct Crossover Solar better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 28 days2×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare