NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition

What Falcon does better (8) and where Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ $500
6.6Display2.6
5.3Battery life6.8
9.8Sports & outdoor5.3
9.6Build & durability5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconInstinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition
49.4 × 47.21345 × 4516.2
FalconInstinct Crossover Solar Tactical EditionDifference
Height47.2 mm45 mm+2.2 mm
Width49.4 mm45 mm+4.5 mm
Thickness13 mm16.2 mm−3.2 mm
Weight64 g65 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 25 h+52%
  2. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition: No
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 176 px2.4×
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 139 ppi2.3×
  6. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition: No
  7. Sport profiles160 vs 84+90%
  8. Thickness13 mm vs 16.2 mm+25%

Why is Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 28 days2×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare