NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Instinct Solar

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Instinct Solar

What Falcon does better (8) and where Instinct Solar wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct Solar
Garmin · 2020Instinct Solar
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ $400
6.6Display2.3
5.3Battery life7.0
9.8Sports & outdoor2.8
9.6Build & durability5.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconInstinct Solar
49.4 × 47.21345 × 4515.3
FalconInstinct SolarDifference
Height47.2 mm45 mm+2.2 mm
Width49.4 mm45 mm+4.5 mm
Thickness13 mm15.3 mm−2.4 mm
Weight64 g53 g+11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Instinct Solar?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct Solar: No
  3. GPS battery life38 h vs 30 h+27%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 128 px3.2×
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 101 ppi3.2×
  6. Sport profiles160 vs 285.7×
  7. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct Solar: No
  8. Thickness13 mm vs 15.3 mm+18%

Why is Instinct Solar better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 24 days+71%
  2. Weight64 g vs 53 g+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare