NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Quatix 6

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Quatix 6

What Falcon does better (7) and where Quatix 6 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Quatix 6
Garmin · 2020Quatix 6
5.8Score
0 advantages≈ $700
5.3Battery life5.5
9.8Sports & outdoor3.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconQuatix 6
49.4 × 47.21347 × 4714.7
FalconQuatix 6Difference
Height47.2 mm47 mm+0.2 mm
Width49.4 mm47 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14.7 mm−1.8 mm
Weight64 g83 g−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Quatix 6?

  1. Sport profiles160 vs 295.5×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 36 h+6%
  3. Weight64 g vs 83 g+30%
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Quatix 6: No
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 260 px+60%
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 14.7 mm+14%

Why is Quatix 6 better than Falcon?

Quatix 6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare