NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Quatix 7

Amazfit Falcon vs Garmin Quatix 7

What Falcon does better (8) and where Quatix 7 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Garmin Quatix 7
Garmin · 2022Quatix 7
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ $600
6.6Display3.8
5.3Battery life7.7
9.8Sports & outdoor9.1
9.6Build & durability4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconQuatix 7
49.4 × 47.21347 × 4714.5
FalconQuatix 7Difference
Height47.2 mm47 mm+0.2 mm
Width49.4 mm47 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness13 mm14.5 mm−1.6 mm
Weight64 g79 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Quatix 7?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Quatix 7: No
  3. Weight64 g vs 79 g+23%
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Quatix 7: No
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  6. Sport profiles160 vs 99+62%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 260 px+60%
  8. Thickness13 mm vs 14.5 mm+12%

Why is Quatix 7 better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 18 days+29%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 57 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare