NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Grit X Pro

Amazfit Falcon vs Polar Grit X Pro

What Falcon does better (9) and where Grit X Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
9 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Polar Grit X Pro
Polar · 2021Grit X Pro
4.0Score
0 advantages≈ $570
6.6Display3.4
5.3Battery life3.5
9.8Sports & outdoor2.2
9.6Build & durability6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconGrit X Pro
49.4 × 47.21347 × 4713
FalconGrit X ProDifference
Height47.2 mm47 mm+0.2 mm
Width49.4 mm47 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness13 mm13 mm−0.1 mm
Weight64 g79 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Grit X Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 6 days2.3×
  2. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Grit X Pro: No
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 35 h+9%
  5. Weight64 g vs 79 g+23%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  7. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.2″+7%
  8. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  9. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 346 mAh+45%

Why is Grit X Pro better than Falcon?

Grit X Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare