NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Ocean

Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Ocean

What Falcon does better (4) and where Ocean wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Suunto Ocean
Suunto · 2024Ocean
9.2Score
5 advantages≈ $750
6.6Display8.4
5.3Battery life7.8
9.8Sports & outdoor6.4
9.6Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconOcean
49.4 × 47.21349.9 × 49.913.3
FalconOceanDifference
Height47.2 mm49.9 mm−2.7 mm
Width49.4 mm49.9 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness13 mm13.3 mm−0.4 mm
Weight64 g99 g−35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Ocean?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Weight64 g vs 99 g+55%
  3. Sport profiles160 vs 95+68%
  4. Thickness13 mm vs 13.3 mm+3%

Why is Ocean better than Falcon?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 65 h+71%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 16 days+14%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 50 h2.4×
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.43″+12%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare