NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Race

Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Race

What Falcon does better (5) and where Race wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race
Suunto · 2023Race
8.6Score
5 advantages≈ $320
6.6Display4.8
5.3Battery life8.6
9.8Sports & outdoor6.4
9.6Build & durability8.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconRace
49.4 × 47.21349 × 4913.3
FalconRaceDifference
Height47.2 mm49 mm−1.8 mm
Width49.4 mm49 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness13 mm13.3 mm−0.4 mm
Weight64 g83 g−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Race?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race: No
  3. Weight64 g vs 83 g+30%
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 95+68%
  5. Thickness13 mm vs 13.3 mm+3%

Why is Race better than Falcon?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 20.8 days+49%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 65 h+71%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 50 h2.4×
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.43″+12%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare