NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Race 3S

Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Race 3S

What Falcon does better (2) and where Race 3S wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
5 advantages≈ $490
6.6Display7.1
9.8Sports & outdoor6.2
9.6Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconRace 3S
49.4 × 47.21346 × 4611.4
FalconRace 3SDifference
Height47.2 mm46 mm+1.2 mm
Width49.4 mm46 mm+3.5 mm
Thickness13 mm11.4 mm+1.5 mm
Weight64 g56 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Race 3S?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 12 days+17%

Why is Race 3S better than Falcon?

  1. Weight64 g vs 56 g+14%
  2. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.32″+3%
  3. Thickness13 mm vs 11.4 mm+14%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 353 ppi+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare