NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Vertical

Amazfit Falcon vs Suunto Vertical

What Falcon does better (7) and where Vertical wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $400
6.6Display4.4
5.3Battery life9.5
9.8Sports & outdoor6.4
9.6Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconVertical
49.4 × 47.21349 × 4913.6
FalconVerticalDifference
Height47.2 mm49 mm−1.8 mm
Width49.4 mm49 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness13 mm13.6 mm−0.7 mm
Weight64 g86 g−22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Vertical?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  3. Weight64 g vs 86 g+34%
  4. Sport profiles160 vs 95+68%
  5. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 280 px+49%
  7. Thickness13 mm vs 13.6 mm+5%

Why is Vertical better than Falcon?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 90 h2.4×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 20.8 days+49%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)21 h vs 65 h3.1×
  4. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.4″+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare