NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs T-Rex Ultra

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Amazfit T-Rex Ultra

What T-Rex 3 does better (7) and where T-Rex Ultra wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
7 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $400
8.3Display8.0
6.9Battery life7.2
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor6.0
8.4Build & durability6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3T-Rex Ultra
48.5 × 48.513.847.3 × 47.313.4
T-Rex 3T-Rex UltraDifference
Height48.5 mm47.3 mm+1.2 mm
Width48.5 mm47.3 mm+1.2 mm
Thickness13.8 mm13.4 mm+0.3 mm
Weight68 g89 g−21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 20 days+35%
  2. Weight68.3 g vs 89 g+30%
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.39″+8%
  4. Battery saver mode40 days vs 25 days+60%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)42 h vs 28 h+50%
  6. Battery capacity700 mAh vs 500 mAh+40%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 46 h+64%
  2. Thickness13.8 mm vs 13.4 mm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare