NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs 9 Peak Pro

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Suunto 9 Peak Pro

What T-Rex 3 does better (7) and where 9 Peak Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
7 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Suunto 9 Peak Pro
Suunto · 20229 Peak Pro
6.1Score
3 advantages≈ $210
8.3Display3.4
6.9Battery life7.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor2.4
8.4Build & durability9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 39 Peak Pro
48.5 × 48.513.843 × 4310.3
T-Rex 39 Peak ProDifference
Height48.5 mm43 mm+5.5 mm
Width48.5 mm43 mm+5.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm10.3 mm+3.4 mm
Weight68 g64 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than 9 Peak Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 21 days+29%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 9 Peak Pro: No
  3. Dual-band GPSYes · 9 Peak Pro: No
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.2″+25%
  5. Resolution (width)480 px vs 240 px2×
  6. Sport profiles170 vs 95+79%
  7. Pixel density322 ppi vs 200 ppi+61%

Why is 9 Peak Pro better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 40 h+43%
  2. Weight68.3 g vs 64 g+7%
  3. Thickness13.8 mm vs 10.3 mm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare