NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Race

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Suunto Race

What T-Rex 3 does better (6) and where Race wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
6 advantages≈ $280
vs
Suunto Race
Suunto · 2023Race
8.6Score
3 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
8.3Display4.8
6.9Battery life8.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor6.4
8.4Build & durability8.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Race
48.5 × 48.513.849 × 4913.3
T-Rex 3RaceDifference
Height48.5 mm49 mm−0.5 mm
Width48.5 mm49 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm13.3 mm+0.4 mm
Weight68 g83 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Race?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 20.8 days+30%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race: No
  3. Weight68.3 g vs 83 g+22%
  4. Sport profiles170 vs 95+79%
  5. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.43″+5%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Race better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 65 h2.3×
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)42 h vs 50 h+19%
  3. Thickness13.8 mm vs 13.3 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare