NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Race S

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Suunto Race S

What T-Rex 3 does better (6) and where Race S wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
6 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
4 advantages≈ $300
8.3Display4.8
6.9Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor6.4
8.4Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Race S
48.5 × 48.513.845 × 4511.4
T-Rex 3Race SDifference
Height48.5 mm45 mm+3.5 mm
Width48.5 mm45 mm+3.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm11.4 mm+2.3 mm
Weight68 g53 g+15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Race S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 9 days3×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race S: No
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.32″+14%
  4. Sport profiles170 vs 95+79%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)42 h vs 30 h+40%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Race S better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 40 h+43%
  2. Weight68.3 g vs 53 g+29%
  3. Thickness13.8 mm vs 11.4 mm+21%
  4. Pixel density322 ppi vs 353 ppi+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare