NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Vertical

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Suunto Vertical

What T-Rex 3 does better (7) and where Vertical wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
7 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $400
8.3Display4.4
6.9Battery life9.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor6.4
8.4Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Vertical
48.5 × 48.513.849 × 4913.6
T-Rex 3VerticalDifference
Height48.5 mm49 mm−0.5 mm
Width48.5 mm49 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm13.6 mm+0.2 mm
Weight68 g86 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Vertical?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 20.8 days+30%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  3. Weight68.3 g vs 86 g+26%
  4. Sport profiles170 vs 95+79%
  5. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  6. Resolution (width)480 px vs 280 px+71%
  7. Pixel density322 ppi vs 200 ppi+61%

Why is Vertical better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 90 h3.2×
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)42 h vs 65 h+55%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare