NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs T-Rex Ultra 2

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (2) and where T-Rex Ultra 2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
5 advantages≈ $550
8.7Display8.8
8.2Battery life8.2
9.6Health tracking9.6
9.5Sports & outdoor9.5
4.1Smart features4.1
9.0Build & durability7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarT-Rex Ultra 2
51.4 × 51.414.551 × 5114.3
T-Rex Dual SolarT-Rex Ultra 2Difference
Height51.4 mm51 mm+0.4 mm
Width51.4 mm51 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm14.3 mm+0.2 mm
Weight69 g89 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. Weight69 g vs 89.2 g+29%
  2. Pixel density353 ppi vs 322 ppi+10%

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 30 days+20%
  2. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.5″+14%
  3. Battery capacity660 mAh vs 870 mAh+32%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 50 h+22%
  5. Resolution (width)466 px vs 480 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare