NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Vertix 2S

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Coros Vertix 2S

What T-Rex Ultra 2 does better (7) and where Vertix 2S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Coros Vertix 2S
Coros · 2024Vertix 2S
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $700
8.8Display4.4
8.2Battery life9.8
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor5.2
7.3Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Ultra 2Vertix 2S
51 × 5114.350.3 × 50.316
T-Rex Ultra 2Vertix 2SDifference
Height51 mm50.3 mm+0.7 mm
Width51 mm50.3 mm+0.7 mm
Thickness14.3 mm16 mm−1.7 mm
Weight89 g87 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Vertix 2S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertix 2S: No
  2. Sport profiles180 vs 434.2×
  3. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)480 px vs 280 px+71%
  5. Pixel density322 ppi vs 200 ppi+61%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)50 h vs 43 h+16%
  7. Thickness14.3 mm vs 16 mm+12%

Why is Vertix 2S better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 118 h3×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 36 days+20%
  3. Weight89.2 g vs 87 g+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare