NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Instinct 3 50mm Solar

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar

What T-Rex Ultra 2 does better (6) and where Instinct 3 50mm Solar wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm Solar
Garmin · 2025Instinct 3 50mm Solar
6.9Score
4 advantages≈ $400
8.8Display4.0
8.2Battery life8.8
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.2
7.3Build & durability5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Ultra 2Instinct 3 50mm Solar
51 × 5114.350 × 5014.4
T-Rex Ultra 2Instinct 3 50mm SolarDifference
Height51 mm50 mm+1 mm
Width51 mm50 mm+1 mm
Thickness14.3 mm14.4 mm−0.1 mm
Weight89 g58 g+31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Instinct 3 50mm Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: No
  2. Resolution (width)480 px vs 176 px2.7×
  3. Pixel density322 ppi vs 113 ppi2.8×
  4. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm Solar: No
  5. Sport profiles180 vs 94+91%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)50 h vs 34 h+47%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm Solar better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 40 days+33%
  2. GPS battery life40 h vs 60 h+50%
  3. Weight89.2 g vs 58 g+54%
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.56″+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare