Dimensions
Size comparison
301Watch
| 301 | Watch | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 41 mm | 44 mm | −3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 301 better than Watch?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Watch: No
- Screen size1.45″ vs 1.28″+13%
Why is Watch better than 301?
Watch has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 41 mm | 44 mm |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.45″ | 1.28″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 8 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
