NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 301 vs Wach 7010

Bea-Fon 301 vs Hama Wach 7010

What 301 does better (0) and where Wach 7010 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Bea-Fon 301
Bea-Fon · 2025301
9.4Score
0 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
vs
Hama Wach 7010
Hama · 2024Wach 7010
9.1Score
0 advantages≈ $70
9.4Display9.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

301Wach 7010
41 × 4146 × 4612
301Wach 7010Difference
Case size41 mm46 mm−5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 301 better than Wach 7010?

301 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Wach 7010 better than 301?

Wach 7010 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare