Dimensions
Size comparison
301PSW 300
| 301 | PSW 300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 41 mm | 41 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 301 better than PSW 300?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 240 mAh+25%
Why is PSW 300 better than 301?
- Screen size1.45″ vs 1.85″+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 41 mm | 41 mm |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.45″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 240 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
