Bea-Fon Watch 102 vs S&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
What Watch 102 does better (0) and where Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.4
Why is Watch 102 better than Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren?
Watch 102 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren better than Watch 102?
Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 4 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 250 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Band 10vsBea-Fon Watch 1028.69.5vs
Bea-Fon Watch 102vsFitbit PSMART PRO Mini Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED9.59.2
vsIce Watch Fit 1.0vsBea-Fon Watch 1029.39.5
vsNilox ONAIRvsBea-Fon Watch 102
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 ProvsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
vsIce Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsS&T Design Smartwatch Fitness Tracker 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren