vs
9.1Display3.5
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is Watch 102 better than Smart Band 9 Active?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Smart Band 9 Active: No
- Screen size1.83″ vs 1.47″+24%
Why is Smart Band 9 Active better than Watch 102?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)4 days vs 18 days4.5×
- Battery capacity250 mAh vs 300 mAh+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 16.5 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.83″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 172 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 4 days | 18 days |
| Battery capacity | 250 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | Android, iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Band 10vsBea-Fon Watch 1028.69.5vs
Bea-Fon Watch 102vsFitbit PSMART PRO Mini Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED9.59.2
vsIce Watch Fit 1.0vsBea-Fon Watch 1029.39.5
vsNilox ONAIRvsBea-Fon Watch 102
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Active5.45.5
vsHama Fit Watch 5000vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Active5.05.5