NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Apex 4 (46mm) vs Forerunner 265

Coros Apex 4 (46mm) vs Garmin Forerunner 265

What Apex 4 (46mm) does better (5) and where Forerunner 265 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Apex 4 (46mm)
Coros · 2025Apex 4 (46mm)
6.0Score
5 advantages≈ $480
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
6 advantages≈ $450
3.8Display5.0
8.2Battery life3.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.6Sports & outdoor5.0
6.5Smart features6.5
4.7Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Apex 4 (46mm)Forerunner 265
46.2 × 46.213.746.1 × 46.112.9
Apex 4 (46mm)Forerunner 265Difference
Height46.2 mm46.1 mm+0.1 mm
Width46.2 mm46.1 mm+0.1 mm
Thickness13.7 mm12.9 mm+0.8 mm
Weight64 g47 g+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Apex 4 (46mm) better than Forerunner 265?

  1. GPS battery life53 h vs 20 h2.6×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)24 days vs 13 days+85%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 14 h2.9×
  4. Storage32 GB vs 8 GB4×
  5. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 265: No

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Apex 4 (46mm)?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Apex 4 (46mm): Yes
  2. Weight64 g vs 47 g+36%
  3. Sport profiles36 vs 58+61%
  4. Resolution (width)260 px vs 416 px+60%
  5. Pixel density200 ppi vs 320 ppi+60%
  6. Thickness13.7 mm vs 12.9 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare