NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265 vs Vantage M3

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Polar Vantage M3

What Forerunner 265 does better (2) and where Vantage M3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Polar Vantage M3
Polar · 2024Vantage M3
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $430
5.0Display6.4
3.6Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.0Sports & outdoor2.9
2.8Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265Vantage M3
46.1 × 46.112.944.7 × 44.712.2
Forerunner 265Vantage M3Difference
Height46.1 mm44.7 mm+1.4 mm
Width46.1 mm44.7 mm+1.4 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.2 mm+0.7 mm
Weight47 g53 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Vantage M3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 8 days+62%
  2. Weight47 g vs 53 g+13%

Why is Vantage M3 better than Forerunner 265?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 27 h+35%
  2. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  3. Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare