NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265 vs Forerunner 570 42mm

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm

What Forerunner 265 does better (5) and where Forerunner 570 42mm wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
5 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 570 42mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 42mm
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $550
5.0Display5.3
3.6Battery life2.6
4.9Health tracking9.4
5.0Sports & outdoor5.5
6.5Smart features3.2
2.8Build & durability3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265Forerunner 570 42mm
46.1 × 46.112.942.4 × 42.412.9
Forerunner 265Forerunner 570 42mmDifference
Height46.1 mm42.4 mm+3.7 mm
Width46.1 mm42.4 mm+3.7 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.9 mm=
Weight47 g42 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Forerunner 570 42mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 10 days+30%
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 18 h+11%
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)14 h vs 13 h+8%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%

Why is Forerunner 570 42mm better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Weight47 g vs 42 g+12%
  2. Sport profiles58 vs 83+43%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare