NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265 vs Forerunner 970

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Garmin Forerunner 970

What Forerunner 265 does better (1) and where Forerunner 970 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $450
vs
Garmin Forerunner 970
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 970
5.9Score
8 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
5.0Display6.5
3.6Battery life4.7
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.0Sports & outdoor6.6
6.5Smart features3.2
2.8Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265Forerunner 970
46.1 × 46.112.947 × 4712.9
Forerunner 265Forerunner 970Difference
Height46.1 mm47 mm−0.9 mm
Width46.1 mm47 mm−0.9 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.9 mm=
Weight47 g56 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Forerunner 970?

  1. Weight47 g vs 56 g+19%

Why is Forerunner 970 better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 15 days+15%
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 26 h+30%
  3. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 265: Yes
  5. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  6. Sport profiles58 vs 94+62%
  7. GPS battery life (dual-band)14 h vs 21 h+50%
  8. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare