NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265 vs Forerunner 570 47mm

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm

What Forerunner 265 does better (3) and where Forerunner 570 47mm wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 570 47mm
Garmin · 2025Forerunner 570 47mm
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ $550
5.0Display6.5
3.6Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking9.4
5.0Sports & outdoor5.5
6.5Smart features3.2
2.8Build & durability2.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265Forerunner 570 47mm
46.1 × 46.112.947 × 4712.9
Forerunner 265Forerunner 570 47mmDifference
Height46.1 mm47 mm−0.9 mm
Width46.1 mm47 mm−0.9 mm
Thickness12.9 mm12.9 mm=
Weight47 g50 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Forerunner 570 47mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 11 days+18%
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 18 h+11%
  3. Weight47 g vs 50 g+6%

Why is Forerunner 570 47mm better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.4″+8%
  2. Sport profiles58 vs 83+43%
  3. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare