NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Nomad vs Approach S50

Coros Nomad vs Garmin Approach S50

What Nomad does better (4) and where Approach S50 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Nomad
Coros · 2025Nomad
5.3Score
4 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S50
Garmin · 2025Approach S50
4.5Score
6 advantages≈ $400
3.8Display5.3
7.9Battery life2.7
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.2Sports & outdoor3.2
2.3Build & durability3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

NomadApproach S50
47.8 × 47.814.843 × 4311.4
NomadApproach S50Difference
Height47.8 mm43 mm+4.8 mm
Width47.8 mm43 mm+4.8 mm
Thickness14.8 mm11.4 mm+3.4 mm
Weight61 g29 g+32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Nomad better than Approach S50?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)22 days vs 10 days2.2×
  2. GPS battery life50 h vs 15 h3.3×
  3. Storage32 GB vs 4 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%

Why is Approach S50 better than Nomad?

  1. Weight61 g vs 29 g2.1×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Nomad: Yes
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 325 ppi+62%
  4. Resolution (width)260 px vs 390 px+50%
  5. Thickness14.8 mm vs 11.4 mm+30%
  6. Sport profiles43 vs 46+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare