NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Fenix 6

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Fenix 6

What Pace Pro does better (7) and where Fenix 6 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
7 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Fenix 6
Garmin · 2019Fenix 6
5.7Score
1 advantage≈ $550
7.0Battery life5.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor3.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProFenix 6
46 × 4612.247 × 4714.7
Pace ProFenix 6Difference
Height46 mm47 mm−1 mm
Width46 mm47 mm−1 mm
Thickness12.2 mm14.7 mm−2.4 mm
Weight49 g80 g−31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Fenix 6?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 14 days+43%
  2. Weight49 g vs 80 g+63%
  3. Storage32 GB vs 0.06 GB533.3×
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 36 h+6%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 260 px+60%
  6. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%
  7. Thickness12.2 mm vs 14.7 mm+20%

Why is Fenix 6 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Sport profiles28 vs 39+39%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare