NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Forerunner 265

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 265

What Pace Pro does better (5) and where Forerunner 265 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
5 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $450
5.0Display5.0
7.0Battery life3.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor5.0
2.7Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProForerunner 265
46 × 4612.246.1 × 46.112.9
Pace ProForerunner 265Difference
Height46 mm46.1 mm−0.1 mm
Width46 mm46.1 mm−0.1 mm
Thickness12.2 mm12.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight49 g47 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 13 days+54%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 20 h+90%
  3. Storage32 GB vs 8 GB4×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 14 h2.2×
  5. Thickness12.2 mm vs 12.9 mm+5%

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Pace Pro?

  1. Sport profiles28 vs 582.1×
  2. Weight49 g vs 47 g+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare