NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Forerunner 265S

Coros Pace Pro vs Garmin Forerunner 265S

What Pace Pro does better (7) and where Forerunner 265S wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
7 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265S
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265S
5.2Score
3 advantages≈ $450
5.0Display5.0
7.0Battery life3.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor5.0
2.7Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProForerunner 265S
46 × 4612.241.7 × 41.712.9
Pace ProForerunner 265SDifference
Height46 mm41.7 mm+4.3 mm
Width46 mm41.7 mm+4.3 mm
Thickness12.2 mm12.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight49 g39 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Forerunner 265S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 15 days+33%
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 24 h+58%
  3. Storage32 GB vs 8 GB4×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 15 h2.1×
  5. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.1″+18%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 360 px+16%
  7. Thickness12.2 mm vs 12.9 mm+5%

Why is Forerunner 265S better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 39 g+26%
  2. Sport profiles28 vs 582.1×
  3. Pixel density320 ppi vs 327 ppi+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare