NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Pacer Pro

Coros Pace Pro vs Polar Pacer Pro

What Pace Pro does better (8) and where Pacer Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
8 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer Pro
Polar · 2022Pacer Pro
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $380
5.0Display2.3
7.0Battery life3.2
4.9Health tracking2.1
3.8Sports & outdoor2.2
2.7Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProPacer Pro
46 × 4612.245 × 4511.5
Pace ProPacer ProDifference
Height46 mm45 mm+1 mm
Width46 mm45 mm+1 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.5 mm+0.8 mm
Weight49 g41 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Pacer Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 6.5 days3.1×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Pacer Pro: No
  3. Offline mapsYes · Pacer Pro: No
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 30 h+27%
  5. TouchscreenYes · Pacer Pro: No
  6. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  7. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  8. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%

Why is Pacer Pro better than Pace Pro?

  1. Weight49 g vs 41 g+20%
  2. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.5 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare