Dimensions
Size comparison
C20 Pro110 4G
| C20 Pro | 110 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 54 mm | 121 mm | −67 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 50 mm | −7 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 14.5 mm | −1.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C20 Pro better than 110 4G?
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 120 px2×
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 111 ppi+86%
- Thickness12.9 mm vs 14.5 mm+12%
Why is 110 4G better than C20 Pro?
- LTE (cellular)No · C20 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity380 mAh vs 1,020 mAh2.7×
- SpeakerNo · C20 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 54 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 84.5 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 14.5 mm |
| Height | 54 mm | 121 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Gray, Orange | Yellow, Aqua, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.81″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 286 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 380 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.1 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
