NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C3 vs C7

Cubot C3 vs Cubot C7

What C3 does better (1) and where C7 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C3
Cubot · 2020C3
4.0Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
Cubot C7
Cubot · 2021C7
3.6Score
2 advantages
2.2Display2.7
2.5Smart features2.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

C3C7
46 × 4614.844 × 4412
C3C7Difference
Height46 mm44 mm+2 mm
Width46 mm44 mm+2 mm
Thickness14.8 mm12 mm+2.8 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C3 better than C7?

  1. Pixel density261 ppi vs 220 ppi+19%

Why is C7 better than C3?

  1. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.54″+18%
  2. Thickness14.8 mm vs 12 mm+23%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare