2.2Display3.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
C3Energy E12
| C3 | Energy E12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 46 mm | 117 mm | −71 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 51 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 14.8 mm | 15 mm | −0.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C3 better than Energy E12?
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 114 ppi2.3×
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 128 px+88%
Why is Energy E12 better than C3?
- Battery capacity260 mAh vs 1,000 mAh3.8×
- Screen size1.3″ vs 1.8″+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 46 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 91 g |
| Thickness | 14.8 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 46 mm | 117 mm |
| Width | 46 mm | 51 mm |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.3″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 114 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 2.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | — |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Chipset | — | Spreadtrum SC6531E |
