3.4Display2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Energy E12102
| Energy E12 | 102 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 117 mm | 114.5 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 51 mm | 50 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 13.7 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 91 g | 74 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Energy E12 better than 102?
Energy E12 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 102 better than Energy E12?
- Weight91 g vs 74 g+23%
- Thickness15 mm vs 13.7 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 91 g | 74 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 117 mm | 114.5 mm |
| Width | 51 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Black | Gray, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.77″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 128 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 114 ppi | 116 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| RAM | 0.004 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Spreadtrum SC6531E | Unisoc SC6531E |
