Dimensions
Size comparison
102105
| 102 | 105 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 114.5 mm | 115.5 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 49.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 14 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 78 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 102 better than 105?
- Weight74 g vs 77.5 g+5%
- Pixel density116 ppi vs 100 ppi+16%
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 120 px+7%
- Thickness13.7 mm vs 14 mm+2%
Why is 105 better than 102?
- Screen size1.77″ vs 2″+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 74 g | 77.5 g |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 114.5 mm | 115.5 mm |
| Width | 50 mm | 49.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Red | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 2″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 100 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.004 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | RTOS OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC6531E | — |
