vs
3.4Display3.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hardcase H10105 4G
| Hardcase H10 | 105 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 109 mm | 121 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 49 mm | 50 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 14.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 80 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hardcase H10 better than 105 4G?
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 120 px+7%
- Pixel density114 ppi vs 111 ppi+3%
Why is 105 4G better than Hardcase H10?
- LTE (cellular)No · Hardcase H10: Yes
- Thickness15 mm vs 14.5 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 80 g | 80.2 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 14.5 mm |
| Height | 109 mm | 121 mm |
| Width | 49 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 114 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| RAM | 0.031 GB | 0.1 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261A | — |
