vs
3.4Display3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hardcase H102.0 SW022
| Hardcase H10 | 2.0 SW022 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 49 mm | 45 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 10.4 mm | +4.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hardcase H10 better than 2.0 SW022?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 200 mAh5×
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.7″+6%
Why is 2.0 SW022 better than Hardcase H10?
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 240 px+88%
- Thickness15 mm vs 10.4 mm+44%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 45 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | — |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 109 mm | — |
| Width | 49 mm | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Mineralglas |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 280 px |
| Pixel density | 114 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 5 days |
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| RAM | 0.031 GB | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261A | — |
