NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S50 vs Race 3S

Garmin Approach S50 vs Suunto Race 3S

What Approach S50 does better (1) and where Race 3S wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S50
Garmin · 2025Approach S50
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $400
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
6 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
5.3Display7.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.2Sports & outdoor6.2
3.9Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S50Race 3S
43 × 4311.446 × 4611.4
Approach S50Race 3SDifference
Height43 mm46 mm−3 mm
Width43 mm46 mm−3 mm
Thickness11.4 mm11.4 mm=
Weight29 g56 g−27 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S50 better than Race 3S?

  1. Weight29 g vs 56 g+93%

Why is Race 3S better than Approach S50?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 12 days+20%
  2. Storage4 GB vs 64 GB16×
  3. Sapphire crystalNo · Approach S50: Yes
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  6. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare