NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S62 vs Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition

Garmin Approach S62 vs Garmin Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition

What Approach S62 does better (6) and where Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S62
Garmin · 2020Approach S62
3.9Score
6 advantages≈ $500
vs
Garmin Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition
5.3Score
4 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
3.8Display2.6
3.8Battery life6.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.6Sports & outdoor5.3
2.3Build & durability5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S62Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition
47 × 4714.845 × 4516.2
Approach S62Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical EditionDifference
Height47 mm45 mm+2 mm
Width47 mm45 mm+2 mm
Thickness14.8 mm16.2 mm−1.4 mm
Weight61 g65 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S62 better than Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition?

  1. Storage1 GB vs 0.06 GB16.7×
  2. Weight61 g vs 65 g+7%
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.27″+2%
  4. Resolution (width)260 px vs 176 px+48%
  5. Pixel density200 ppi vs 139 ppi+44%
  6. Thickness14.8 mm vs 16.2 mm+9%

Why is Instinct Crossover Solar Tactical Edition better than Approach S62?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 28 days2×
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. GPS battery life20 h vs 25 h+25%
  4. Sport profiles19 vs 844.4×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare