NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S62 vs 9 Peak

Garmin Approach S62 vs Suunto 9 Peak

What Approach S62 does better (3) and where 9 Peak wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S62
Garmin · 2020Approach S62
3.9Score
3 advantages≈ $500
vs
Suunto 9 Peak
Suunto · 20219 Peak
4.2Score
5 advantages
Higher score
3.8Display3.0
3.8Battery life2.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.6Sports & outdoor2.4
2.3Build & durability9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S629 Peak
47 × 4714.843 × 4310.6
Approach S629 PeakDifference
Height47 mm43 mm+4 mm
Width47 mm43 mm+4 mm
Thickness14.8 mm10.6 mm+4.2 mm
Weight61 g62 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S62 better than 9 Peak?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 7 days2×
  2. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  3. Resolution (width)260 px vs 240 px+8%

Why is 9 Peak better than Approach S62?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 25 h+25%
  3. Sport profiles19 vs 804.2×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Approach S62: Yes
  5. Thickness14.8 mm vs 10.6 mm+40%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare