NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S70 42mm vs Forerunner 265

Garmin Approach S70 42mm vs Garmin Forerunner 265

What Approach S70 42mm does better (3) and where Forerunner 265 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S70 42mm
Garmin · 2023Approach S70 42mm
4.4Score
3 advantages≈ $650
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
5 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
5.3Display5.0
2.7Battery life3.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.2Sports & outdoor5.0
6.5Smart features6.5
2.9Build & durability2.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S70 42mmForerunner 265
42 × 4212.646.1 × 46.112.9
Approach S70 42mmForerunner 265Difference
Height42 mm46.1 mm−4.1 mm
Width42 mm46.1 mm−4.1 mm
Thickness12.6 mm12.9 mm−0.3 mm
Weight44 g47 g−3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S70 42mm better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Storage16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  2. Weight44 g vs 47 g+7%
  3. Thickness12.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+2%

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Approach S70 42mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 13 days+30%
  2. GPS battery life15 h vs 20 h+33%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  4. Sport profiles40 vs 58+45%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare